Determining carbon offset quality with remote sensing:
A Technical Guide to Rating Forest Carbon Projects
Forest carbon offsets are notorious for their unreliable quality, and many do not actually offset carbon emissions at all. With so many companies relying on carbon offsets as part of their sustainability strategy, this quality control problem has disasterous impacts on climate change.

Evaluating Forest Carbon Projects:

Assessing the Quality and Accuracy of Carbon Offsets Through Advanced Methods.
We use tree cover estimates, boundary analysis, and global space-borne carbon stock assessments to provide a comprehensive evaluation of forest carbon projects. These methods help us identify discrepancies, assess carbon sequestration claims, and ensure the integrity of nature-based carbon offsets.
Zombie
Credits
A Hidden Problem Undermining
Carbon Markets
In the opaque world of carbon credits, a troubling phenomenon known as "zombie credits" has emerged, raising significant concerns about the credibility and effectiveness of carbon offsetting.

As seen in...

Resources

Announcement

Renoster Supports Launch of Neutral's REDD Trading Platform

Renoster Supports Launch of Neutral's REDD Trading Platform
Article

Are “High-Quality Credits” Always Aligned with Climate Progress?

Are “High-Quality Credits” Always Aligned with Climate Progress?
Blog

Zombie Credits

Zombie Credits
Announcement

Global Database of Nature-Based Carbon Offset Boundaries

Global Database of Nature-Based Carbon Offset Boundaries
Blog

Implementing Tonne-Year Accounting in Carbon Credits

Implementing Tonne-Year Accounting in Carbon Credits
Blog

The Inherent Flaws of Carbon Credit Contract Lengths

The Inherent Flaws of Carbon Credit Contract Lengths
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.